Curtis first implied that the so-called SUE "is not a standard at all, but just a whitewash of Broadcom's standards and specifications." Curtis also further accused SUE of not currently proposing specifications for data transmission latency.

Curtis首先暗示所谓的 SUE“根本不是一项标准，只是博通标准和规范的粉饰。”他还进一步指责 SUE 目前没有提出关于数据传输延迟的规范。

In response to Curtis's attack, Ram responded emphatically: "Asking this question shows you don't understand Ethernet at all. Ethernet never defines latency in its standards. Customers choose the low-latency switches they prefer... You want to set a latency standard because you don't know how to design a low-latency switch, right?"

Ram also questioned the PCIe specification behind UALink. It was primarily used for short-distance chip transmission in the past, making it difficult to support long-distance transmission between thousands of processors like Ethernet. "Does any company currently have a PCIe switch with enough buffer memory to support long-distance transmission? Good luck," he said.

拉姆还质疑了 UALink 背后的 PCIe 规范。它过去主要用于短距离芯片传输，这使得它难以支持像以太网那样在数千个处理器之间进行长距离传输。“目前是否有任何公司拥有足够缓冲的 PCIe 交换机来支持长距离传输？祝你好运，”