A copy of the national college entrance exam was admitted as evidence in a liability case concerning liqueur in Ningxia Hui autonomous region late last year, according to People's Daily.
原告起诉十倍赔偿9.3万余元
提交高考试卷作证据
The dispute began with a person surnamed Liu buying 16 bottles of liqueur online in 2021. Produced by a wine company in Ningxia, the liqueur only had grapes and sulfur dioxide labeled as ingredients.
Liu suspected the wine company was withholding information about the ingredients, since liqueur usually is a sweetened alcoholic beverage with various flavors, potentially with rum, whisky or other liquor added as a base spirit.
The alcohol content of the liqueur he bought was labeled as 18 percent, but a question on the test indicates the highest alcohol content of wine brewed in natural conditions would be 16.2 percent.
Liu then sued the company for breaching the Food Safety Law, which stipulates food ingredients should be clearly labeled. He demanded a refund of the 9,300 yuan ($1,305) he spent on the liqueur and compensation of 93,000 yuan.
但法院认为，虽然本案中的利口葡萄酒原料中只标注“葡萄、食品添加剂（二氧化硫）”，没有标全利口葡萄酒的所有配料，在标签上存在瑕疵，但并非是不安全食品，该标注不会对消费者造成误导。原告也没有提供证据证实因饮用该酒受到了损害，故对其主张不予支持，原告刘某的诉讼请求被驳回。
《中华人民共和国食品安全法》第一百五十条中规定：
食品安全，指食品无毒、无害，符合应当有的营养要求，对人体健康不造成任何急性、亚急性或者慢性危害。
第二十六条规定，食品安全标准应当包括下列内容：（四）对卫生、营养等食品安全要求有关的标签、标志、说明书的要求。
第六十七条规定，预包装食品的包装上应当有标签。标签应当标明下列事项：（二）成分或者配料表。
Last year, a people's court in Yongning county ruled that the liqueur didn't label all the ingredients, but the exclusion didn't make the liqueur unsafe or mislead the consumer. It also found the liqueur didn't cause any harm to the plaintiff's well-being or property, rejecting Liu's claims.
江苏亿诚律师事务所的徐旭东律师表示，高考试卷具有权威性，题目中涉及的科学、技术知识都是成熟且经过实践反复验证的内容，因此只要符合真实性、合法性、关联性的证据三性要求，是可以在法庭上作为当事人的书证使用并被法庭所采纳的。
According to lawyer Xu Xudong from the Jiangsu Fides Law Firm, as long as it is authentic, legal and relevant to the case, the test paper can be admitted as evidence.
记者：全占福
来源：中国青年报 扬子晚报/紫牛新闻 裁判文书网 中国日报网
推 荐 阅 读
