Kubernetes: External Secrets Operator vs. CSI Driver

Introduction

In Kubernetes, managing secrets like API keys and database passwords is a critical task. While Kubernetes has a built-in Secret object, its default base64 encoding doesn't offer strong protection. This has led to the rise of better solutions. This article will introduce the external-secrets project, compare it with the popular Secrets Store CSI Driver, and explore other leading solutions to help everyone choose the right tool for their needs.

What is External Secrets Operator?

External Secrets Operator (ESO) is a Kubernetes operator that bridges the gap between external secret management systems and a Kubernetes cluster. It reads secrets from providers like AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, or Google Secret Manager and automatically creates and synchronizes them as native Kubernetes Secret objects within the cluster.

The core idea is simple: the source of truth for secrets remains in a secure, external vault. ESO ensures that a mirrored, native Secret is always available for applications inside the cluster. This allows applications to use secrets in the standard Kubernetes way, without needing to know where the secrets actually come from.

Here is a simple diagram showing how it works:

The Big Debate: External Secrets Operator vs. Secrets Store CSI Driver

While ESO creates native Kubernetes Secret objects, the Secrets Store CSI Driver takes a different approach. Let's compare them.

Core Mechanism

• External Secrets Operator (ESO)
  : It synchronizes secrets into Secret objects stored in etcd (the Kubernetes database). Applications then access these Secret objects as they normally would, either as environment variables or mounted files.
• Secrets Store CSI Driver
  : It mounts secrets from external stores directly into pods as a volume. The secrets appear as files in the pod's filesystem. Crucially, the secret data is never stored in etcd. This is a key security advantage.

Key Differences

• Security
  : The CSI driver is often seen as more secure because secrets are not stored in etcd. This reduces the attack surface, as someone gaining access to etcd backups would not find the secret values.
• Compatibility
  : ESO has a big advantage in compatibility. Many existing applications, Helm charts, and tools are designed to work with native Kubernetes Secret objects. ESO works seamlessly with them. The CSI driver, on the other hand, requires modifying pod deployments to mount the secret volume, which can be difficult with third-party tools.
• Ease of Use
  : For developers, using native Secret objects created by ESO can be simpler, as it's the standard Kubernetes way. The CSI driver introduces a new concept (CSI volumes for secrets) that teams need to learn.

Which One to Choose? The choice depends on the project's priorities.

• Choose External Secrets Operator if the main goal is easy integration with existing tools and Helm charts, and the security model allows for secrets to be stored (encrypted at rest) in etcd.
• Choose Secrets Store CSI Driver if the top priority is security and avoiding storing secrets in etcd is a strict requirement.

Are There More Popular Solutions?

Yes, the world of Kubernetes secret management is diverse. Besides ESO and the CSI driver, two other very popular approaches are HashiCorp Vault and Sealed Secrets.

HashiCorp Vault Vault is a powerful, dedicated tool for managing secrets. It's more than just a store; it's a comprehensive system with features like dynamic secrets (credentials that are created on-demand and expire automatically), encryption as a service, and detailed audit logs.

Vault can integrate with Kubernetes in several ways:

• As a Backend
  : Both ESO and the Secrets Store CSI Driver can use Vault as their external secret store.
• Agent Injector
  : Vault has its own "agent injector" that automatically modifies pods to get secrets directly from Vault. This is similar to the CSI driver approach but is specific to the Vault ecosystem.

Vault is an excellent choice for organizations that need a central, powerful secret management platform across all their applications, not just those in Kubernetes.

Sealed Secrets Sealed Secrets offers a unique solution for a common problem: how to safely store secrets in a public Git repository? This is a key challenge for GitOps workflows.

Here’s how it works:

1. A SealedSecret controller is installed in the cluster. It generates a public/private key pair.
2. A developer uses a command-line tool (kubeseal) with the controller's public key to encrypt a standard Kubernetes Secret file. This creates a SealedSecret custom resource.
3. This encrypted SealedSecret file is safe to commit to a Git repository.
4. When the SealedSecret is applied to the cluster, only the controller, using its private key, can decrypt it and create a regular Kubernetes Secret.

Sealed Secrets is not about connecting to external vaults. It's about enabling a secure "GitOps for secrets" workflow.

Conclusion

When comparing External Secrets Operator to the Secrets Store CSI Driver, the main difference is the trade-off between compatibility and security. ESO creates native Secret objects, making it highly compatible, while the CSI driver mounts secrets as volumes, avoiding storage in etcd for better security.

Looking at the broader landscape, HashiCorp Vault offers a feature-rich, centralized platform for enterprises, and Sealed Secrets provides an elegant solution for managing secrets within a GitOps pipeline. There is no single "best" solution; the right choice depends on the specific security requirements, existing infrastructure, and development workflows of a team.