大数跨境
0
0

Legal and Practical Issues on Import of Medical Devices - India

Legal and Practical Issues on Import of Medical Devices - India 安杰世泽律师事务所
2020-05-08
2
导读:本文系印度Khaitan & Co律师事务所原创,世泽律师事务所翻译整理。

作者:印度Khaitan & Co律师事务所的Atul Pandey(合伙人)、Arjun Bhagi(资深律师)和Varun Yadav(律师)

中文编译者:世泽律师事务所

India’s national investment promotion and facilitation agency, Invest India, pegs India as the fourth-largest market for medical devices and amongst the top-20 markets globally. The current market size of this sector in India stands at USD 11 billion. Further, India imports approximately 80% of its annual demand for medical devices. The major exporters of medical devices to India are the USA, Germany, China, and Singapore, in no particular order. Several Indian states have set up dedicated economic zones to promote manufacturing of medical devices. Despite these active steps, India continues to be dependent on overseas manufacturers to fulfil its demand for medical devices. In this article, we have analysed the regulatory regime governing the import of medical devices in India from China. In the first part, we provide an overview of the legal regime applicable to the import of medical devices, especially from the standpoint of Chinese exporters and Indian importers. In the second part, we analyse the regulatory regime applicable to the import of medical devices that are useful in dealing with the COVID-19 situation. Lastly, we cover a few practical aspects that would be relevant for Chinese exporters of medical devices.


OVERVIEW OF STATUTORY LAWS AND REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO MEDICAL DEVICES

1. The applicable law


In India, the manufacture, import, sale, and distribution of medical devices is regulated under the Drugs & Cosmetic Act 1940 (“D&C Act”) and rules made thereunder and specifically, the Medical Devices Rules 2017 (“MD Rules”). The Central Drug Standards Control Organization (“CDSCO”), set up by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (“MoHFW”), is India’s chief regulatory body for pharmaceuticals and medical devices. The MoHFW is authorized under the MD Rules, read with the D&C Act and rules, to notify medical devices and regulate their manufacture, import, sale, and distribution in India. These regulated medical devices are substances and devices which are notified from time to time by the MoHFW under Sections 3(b)(i), 3(b)(ii) and 3(b)(iv) of the D&C Act. Until recently, medical devices that were not notified, were not regulated under Indian laws, and hence these devices could be manufactured, imported, sold and distributed in India like any other product. 

 

Until very recently, there were only a limited number of regulated medical devices (twenty four in number), and additional thirteen medical devices were proposed to be notified and regulated from a specified date under the MD Rules (collectively “Notified Medical Devices”, and as set out in Annexure 1 of this article). This regime underwent a tectonic shift on 11 February 2020, when the MoHFW released two key notifications. Through the first notification (“Definition Notification”), the MoHFW introduced an all-encompassing definition of medical devices under Section 3(b)(iv) of the D&C Act. The revised definition reads as follows:


All devices including an instrument, apparatus, appliance, implant, material or other article, whether used alone or in combination, including a software or an accessory, intended by its manufacturer to be used specially for human beings or animals which does not achieve the primary intended action in or on human body or animals by any pharmacological or immunological or metabolic means, but which may assist in its intended function by such means for one or more of the specific purposes of:


  • diagnosis,   prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of any disease or disorder;

  • diagnosis,   monitoring, treatment, alleviation or assistance for, any injury or   disability;

  • investigation,   replacement or modification or support of the anatomy or of a physiological   process;

  • supporting   or sustaining life;

  •  disinfection   of medical devices; and

  •  control   of conception.


The Definition Notification has expanded the scope of regulated medical devices from existing thirty seven, to approximately all devices that can be categorized by a lay-man as ‘medical devices’. This definition is extensive and subjective and is aimed at including all medical devices being sold in the Indian market. This approach is a stark alteration to the approach adopted by the government so far, wherein, only a minimal number of notified medical devices were regulated, and all other medical devices were unregulated. Given the wording of the definition and absence of a specific list of medical devices, it appears that all medical devices (whether or not notified by the MoHFW in the past) are automatically placed under regulation by virtue of the Definition Notification. In other words, all medical devices fall under the regulatory purview of the MD Rules. For sake of clarity, we have made reference in this article to all regulated medical devices, other than the Notified Medical Devices, as “Non-Notified Medical Devices”.


The other change introduced on 11 February 2020 was an amendment to the MD Rules (“Amendment Notification”), by way of which Chapter IIIA has been added in the MD Rules. The Amendment Notification states that all Non-Notified Medical Devices are required to be registered with the Drugs Controller General of India (“DCGI”). The Amendment Notification is ancillary to the Definition Notification, as the Amendment Notification aims to set out the regulatory framework for such Non-Notified Medical Devices which to date have remained unregulated.


The Amendment Notification and the Definition Notification have come into effect from 1 April 2020.


2. Risk-based classification of medical devices


The MD Rules have been framed on the lines of the guidelines formulated by the International Medical Device Regulators Forum, which ensures that the norms governing medical devices in India are at-par with those followed in other jurisdictions. Regulated medical devices have been classified into four categories under the MD Rules, with Class A devices being lowest in terms of risk and Class D devices being the highest.


Unlike other countries that give liberty to manufacturers / importers to classify their product for the purpose of registration, the MD Rules do not provide this liberty and the manufacturers / importers will have to follow the classification decided by CDSCO.


3. Product standards for medical devices.


The medical devices being imported in India must mandatorily conform to the standards prescribed in the MD Rules. The standards laid down by the Bureau of Indian Standards (“BIS”) or as may be notified by the MoHFW are the prescribed standards. In case a no relevant standard has been laid down by BIS or MoHFW, then the standard laid down by International Organisation for Standardisation or the International Electro Technical Commission or any other pharmacopoeial standards shall apply. If such standards are also not available, then the validated manufacturer’s standards shall become binding.


4. Registration and license requirements for import of medical devices (prescribed under MD Rules)


For import of Non-Notified Medical Devices for the next few months, the MD Rules through Amendment Notification have recently introduced norms for obtaining online registration from the DCGI. The registration is presently optional but shall become compulsory from 1 October 2021. The applicant will be required to furnish basic information about himself and the device, a certificate of compliance with respect to ISO 13485 standard accredited by National Accreditation Board for Certification Bodies or International Accreditation Forum in respect of such medical device, free sale certificate from the country of origin and an undertaking that the information furnished by the applicant is true and authentic. The process, though recent, appears to be straightforward.


For import of Notified Medical Devices, the applicant (“Applicant”) is required to obtain a ‘license’ (and not a ‘registration’, as discussed above). The registration regime appears to have been introduced as a temporary measure for regulation of Non-Notified Medical Devices. With passage of time, even importers of Non-Notified Medical Devices will be required to mandatorily obtain a license (notwithstanding their ‘registration’ as an importer). With effect from 11 August 2022, importers of Class A and Class B Non-Notified Medical Devices will be required to mandatorily obtain a license, whereas importers of Class C and Class D Non-Notified Medical Devices will be required to mandatorily obtain a license with effect from 11 August 2023.


The Applicant for an import license may be an individual or an organization already in possession of a licence to manufacture for sale or distribution under MD Rules or wholesale license for sale or distribution under D&C Act and rules. An overseas manufacturer can also get an India based nominee to obtain a license and undertake import of medical device in India. To give effect to such a relationship, the overseas manufacturer will have to issue a power of attorney in favour of the Indian applicant. In order to apply for the import license, the Applicant must either have a license to manufacture for sale or distribution, or a wholesale license for sale or distribution, as specified under the MD Rules. Depending on the risk-classification of the device, the prescribed authority for issuing manufacturing license is either the DCGI or the drugs department of the relevant state government. Wholesale license for sale and distribution are issued by the drugs department of the relevant state government.


The Applicant will be required to make an application for grant of import licence for medical device to the DCGI through an online portal [https://cdscomdonline.gov.in/NewMedDev/Homepage] in Form MD-14. The application fee is set-out in the Second Schedule of the MD Rules. It ranges from USD 50 to USD 6,000, depending on factors like purpose, risk-classification, number of manufacturing sites, etc. The license shall be valid until perpetuity, so long as the Applicant makes payment of the prescribed renewal fee after completion of 5 years from the date of issue of license.


DCGI, by itself or an appointed third party, has the right to inspect the overseas manufacturing facility as part of application scrutiny. For obtaining a license to import Class C and Class D medical devices from China, the Applicant will have to establish safety and effectiveness through clinical investigation in India. In the case of Class A and Class B medical devices, the Applicant will have to establish the safety and effectiveness through published safety and performance data or through clinical investigation in China and a free sale certificate from China.


After examination of documents, DCGI may either grant a license in Form MD-15 or reject the application. The MD Rules specify an outer time limit of nine months (from date of application) for giving its final verdict. In the event of rejection, the Applicant may appeal to the MoHFW within a period of forty five days and the MoHFW , may, after such enquiry into the matter, as considered necessary, pass orders in relation thereto within ninety days from the date of appeal.


5. Compliance requirements for registration-holders and license holders (prescribed under MD Rules)


The compliance requirements for an import registration are limited. The importer is only required to mention the registration number on the label of the medical device. Nevertheless, the DCGI has the authority to cancel the registration number or suspend it for a period if the registrant has failed to comply with any provision of the MD Rules.


The compliances are relatively more for a ‘license’ holder. An import license holder has to undertake the following ongoing / event-based compliances:

 

  • The license holder should be available for inspection as and when requested by competent authorities.

  • The license holder has an obligation to inform DCGI within 15 days in case of any administrative action taken on account of any adverse reaction, such as market withdrawal, regulatory restrictions, cancellation of authorisation or declaration of the medical device as not of standards quality by the regulatory authority of the country of origin or by any regulatory authority of any other country, where the medical device is marketed, sold or distributed. In such cases, the license holder is obligated to stop the dispatch and marketing of such medical devices with immediate effect. DCGI is within its right in such situations to issue any directions issue directions to the licensee in respect of marketing, sale or distribution of the medical device, including withdrawal of medical device from the Indian market within a specified period.

    The MD Rules also provide sweeping powers to the DCGI prohibit the sale or recall an entire batch(s) of the medical device if such medical devices are not found to conform with the D&C Act and / or MD Rules.

  • In case of any significant change in the medical device (for instance, material of construction, intended use, approved shelf life, etc), the license holder is obligated to obtain prior approval from DCGI. For minor changes, (for instance, design which does not effect quality in respect of specifications, etc), the license holder is required to notify the DCGI.

  • The license holder is obligated to inform DCGI, within 30 days, in case of a change in the constitution of overseas manufacturers. In case of a change in the constitution of the license holder itself, the license holder shall have to obtain a fresh license from the date of change of such a constitution.

  • The import consignment of medical devices should be accompanied by an invoice or statement showing the name and quantity of the medical device.

  • The licensee should supply the medical device for sale or offer it for sale along with its package insert or user manual, wherever applicable.


The prices of medical devices have recently come under the regulation of the Government. With effect from 1 April 2020, medical devices have to be retailed in India as per the pricing mechanics set out by the Government. With this change, the Government has taken away the pricing flexibility that the medical device industry enjoyed previously in the Indian market.


6. Registration and compliance requirements for import of medical devices (prescribed under other laws)


An importer of medical devices is also required to comply and obtain registrations under other Indian laws, that are otherwise generally applicable to all importers. These include obtaining an importer-exporter code, filing tax returns, complying with employee welfare laws, etc.


The import of medical devices is similar to the import of any other goods in the territory of the country. The importer is required to file a bill of entry along with supporting documents, and also pay the specified custom duty. The custom officials examine the goods against the bill of entry, and thereafter permit entry of goods into India.


The importer can freely remit monies for making payments for imports into India. As part of the procedure, the importer will have to furnish sufficient documents so that the remitting Indian bank is assured of receipt of all the requisite details and that the remittance is for bona fide trade transactions as per applicable laws in force. Remittances against imports should be completed not later than six months from the date of shipment, except in cases where amounts are withheld towards guarantee of performance. In special circumstances, banks may permit settlement of import dues delayed for the reason of disputes, financial difficulties, etc.



SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR IMPORT OF MEDICAL DEVICES FOR DEALING WITH COVID-19 SITUATION

Like other countries, India is also battling the outbreak of COVID-19. As of 22 April 2020, approx. 20,000 people have been infected with COVID-19 in India, resulting in death of approx. 650. The Indian Government realizes the urgent need to provide special conditions for regulating medical devices used to diagnose, prevent and treat COVID-19, such as diagnostic tests, ventilators, and personal protective equipment - including masks, face shields, respirators, gowns, and gloves. The need of these special conditions arises because India does not have the domestic capability to cater to the skyrocketing demand of such medical devices. India depends heavily on devices imported from countries like China to plug this demand-supply gap. In this regard, the CDSCO, through a notice dated 19 March 2020, has stated that applications to import in-vitro diagnostic kit for sale and distribution would be processed on priority through expedited review / accelerated approval. Further, CDSCO through its circular dated 15 April 2020 has stated that it will accept self-attested import license application without notarised and apostilled documents with an undertaking that they will submit notarised and apostilled application once situation normalises.


The Finance Ministry has also exempted the import of following devices, used for dealing with COVID-19, from levy of custom duty and health cess until 30 September 2020: ventilators, face masks and surgical masks, personal protection equipment, COVID-19 testing kits and substances used for manufacturing any of these devices. We expect more relaxations to be introduced by the Government in the coming days to maintain adequate supply of these life-saving medical devices.



KEY PRACTICAL ASPECTS

India’s need for imported medical devices does not show any indications of a slow-down, notwithstanding the measures taken by the Indian government to make India a hub for the manufacture of medical devices. Chinese exporters have an important role to play in meeting the requirement of a densely populated country like India. While this presents an excellent business opportunity for Chinese exporters, care must be taken that the products supplied to India are in sync with the product quality parameters set out under the MD Rules. We have seen a few instances where medical devices imported (for instance, COVID-19 test kits) from China have come under regulatory scrutiny for malfunctioning or sub-standard quality. This is largely due to lack of awareness amongst Chinese exporters on the applicable laws on medical devices in India, which has undergone several changes in the recent past. There is no registration requirement for an exporter of medical devices; however, the import in India cannot be made till the importer in India is registered and the products supplied by the exporter comply with the technical and safety specifications laid down by the Indian government. Accordingly, Chinese exporters are advised to discuss their business plans with their Indian legal counsel, who can help them navigate through the myriad of regulations.

On a practical front, the timelines of obtaining registrations / licenses are likely to exceed the timelines prescribed under the MD Rules. This is owing to the varying workload of the relevant government department. To remain compliant, Chinese exporters should make applications in advance so that they are in receipt of their registrations / approvals within the due deadline. Especially after the Amendment Notifications, the scale of regulatory regime has been enhanced, and Chinese exporters should be well-aware of their obligations under the MD Rules. It is important to note herein that violation of the D&C Act and the MDR Rules, including failure to obtain prescribed license of registration, can attract fine or criminal prosecution.


The new changes also open up a debate on the nature of devices that come under the regulatory purview of the Indian government. The Amendment Notification appears to bring all universal items, which can be used towards diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of diseases, injury, disability, or towards supporting life, within the ambit of registered medical devices. Could it mean that dishes used to feed patients in hospitals also come within the purview of MD Rules? Or an accounting software used by the hospital for maintaining its financial books gets classified as a registered medical devices? We will have to wait and hope that the MoHFW releases clarifications on the ambit of medical devices that are governed under the scope of MD Rules. 

—— Atul Pandey (Partner)

 Arjun Bhagi (Senior Associate)

Varun Yadav (Associate)


Khaitan & Co, New Delhi, India 

22 April 2020




ANNEXURE 1





Atul Pandey

Partner

Atul Pandey is a Partner in the Corporate team and is based out of the New Delhi office. He advises on corporate and commercial issues, regulatory matters including under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, FDI Policy and obtaining approvals, mergers & acquisitions (domestic and cross-border), domestic and cross-border joint ventures, capital markets, private equity investment, labour & employment and trade laws, direct & indirect tax, dispute resolution, banking & finance and other areas of corporate law practice. He has been recognised as the Next Generation Corporate and M&A Lawyers in India by the prestigious “Legal 500” consecutively for three years from 2017 to 2019.



Arjun Bhagi

Senior Associate

Arjun Bhagi is a Senior Associate in the Corporate team and based out of the New Delhi office. He regularly advises foreign and Indian companies on mergers & acquisitions, private equity, joint venture, foreign exchange and other general corporate issues. Further, he has extensive experience in public markets transactions.  He graduated from The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata with B.A. LL.B. (Hons.).



Varun Yadav

Associate

Varun Yadav is an Associate in the Corporate team and based out of the New Delhi office. He has been involved in cross-border and domestic mergers & acquisitions, joint venture and regulatory transactions along with corporate restructurings by way of schemes of arrangements. He graduated from National Law School of India University, Bangalore with B.A. LL.B. (Hons.). 




Khaitan & Co

is one of India's oldest and recognised full service law firms. Built on foundations of integrity, simplicity, dedication and professionalism, the Firm has expanded its presence in India from Kolkata (1911) to New Delhi (1970) to Bangalore (1994) to Mumbai (2001). The Firm takes pride in its steady growth and celebrated its centenary year in 2011 (11 November 2011). The Firm has a strength of 650+ fee earners, including 139 partners and directors, in its 4 offices.





特别声明:
以上信息仅供一般性参考,不应视为针对特定事务的法律意见或依据。本文系印度Khaitan & Co律师事务所原创,世泽律师事务所翻译整理。如需转载,请注明来源。





【声明】内容源于网络
0
0
安杰世泽律师事务所
安杰世泽律师事务所提供高品质综合性法律服务。业务领域包括:资本市场与证券、竞争法/反垄断、PE & VC、知识产权、争议解决、劳动雇佣、跨境投资与并购、保险、海商海事、银行与金融、能源、TMT、生命科学与医疗健康、私人财富管理、体育等。
内容 3425
粉丝 0
安杰世泽律师事务所 安杰世泽律师事务所提供高品质综合性法律服务。业务领域包括:资本市场与证券、竞争法/反垄断、PE & VC、知识产权、争议解决、劳动雇佣、跨境投资与并购、保险、海商海事、银行与金融、能源、TMT、生命科学与医疗健康、私人财富管理、体育等。
总阅读990
粉丝0
内容3.4k