大数跨境

Expert Insight: China's New Foreign Investment Regulations

Expert Insight: China's New Foreign Investment Regulations Trustiics 诚汇达
2020-04-25
2
导读:What you need to know about China’s new foreign investment regulations.
点击上方蓝字关注“Trustiics诚汇达”

National Treatment and Stronger Protection/Reassurance: 

What you need to know about China’s new foreign investment regulations

As of January 1st, 2020, foreign-invested enterprises (“FIEs”) in China have come into a new era due to the implementation of a number of laws and regulations on foreign investment; these include the Foreign Investment Law, Implementing Regulations of the Foreign Investment Law, Measures for Reporting of Information on Foreign Investment, Circular of the State Administration for Market Regulation on Effective Work on Registration of Foreign-invested Enterprises for the Implementation of the Foreign Investment Law, and Interpretations of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Foreign Investment Law of the People's Republic of China (the above will be referred to below as the new Foreign Investment Law).

Some highlights/take-aways of this new regulatory regime:  


01

“National Treatment” — FIEs are now generally treated as domestic companies 


Originally, FIEs (foreign-invested entities) were treated differently from domestic companies (i.e., companies incorporated by Chinese citizens) under the three separately promulgated “FIE Laws” (i.e., Wholly Foreign-owned Enterprise Law, Sino-Foreign Equity Joint Venture Law, and Sino-Foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Law) and their relevant implementation regulations. These FIE Laws were enacted several decades ago, and were more restrictive in nature compared to the Company Law enacted more recently, regulating domestic companies. Take a Sino-Foreign JV for instance: under the three FIE Laws, (a) the highest authority of a Sino-Foreign JV was its board, and certain matters needed a unanimous consent of all the directors, which could easily trigger a dilemma between the foreign and the Chinese JV partners in practice; (b) the share transfer of the equity interest in the Sino-Foreign JV required the other non-transferring shareholder’s approval, which created difficulties for M&A transactions ora foreign partner’s exit; (c) the distribution of profits could only be inproportion to the shareholder’s actual capital contribution, which made it impossible to agree upon a more innovative profit-sharing mechanism between the shareholders to address their commercial needs. With the repealing of the three old “FIE Laws,” FIEs now will be regulated in the same manner as domestic companies under the unified Company Law, and FIEs will now be able to enjoy a more liberal and commercially oriented legal regime in terms of corporate governance.

For FIEs already in existence, the Foreign Investment Law gives a five-year transition period to make the required adjustments in their corporate governance-related documents. However, it is advisable to initiate a compliance review of the current articles / constitutional documents sooner, and although these changes may seem to be made to comply with mandatory legal requirements on the face of things, it can be expected that in some cases, the already-delicate balance or tension between the foreign investors and their Chinese partners may be disrupted. It is thus advisable for the foreign investor to think things through thoroughly and strategically before discussing with their Chinese partner.
02


MOFCOM pre-approval / filing is replaced by new “Information Reporting” mechanism 


Prior to the Foreign Investment Law, setting up an FIE engaging in “restricted business” as set forth in the “Negative List” promulgated by the commerce department of the PRC (i.e., the MOFCOM) would be closely examined by MOFCOM before an approval would begranted. In order to receive such approval, all the required constitutional documents were put under strict scrutiny by local offices of MOFCOM where the FIE would be set up, and in practice, a different local office of MOFCOM might hold its own discretional view when granting the approval, which created practical issues or difficulties for foreign investors. FIEs not engaging in the restricted business in the Negative List would also be required to file a registration with MOFCOM post-establishment.

The above-mentioned MOFCOM approval / registration requirements have all been eliminated by the new Foreign Investment Law; now, the setup of FIEs (not within a restricted area of business) will, like domestic companies, be required to go through only the routine registration process with the corporate registration authorities. We believe this revision will guarantee new foreign investors a more transparent, predictable and quicker set-up process.

Unlike under the old approval regime, FIEs are now regulated via clearly defined and more comprehensive and market-oriented disclosure requirements. FIEs shall submit certain required corporate information, including some basic information about the corporation and its shareholders, corporate investments, and certain operating and financial information. This information will be submitted to MOFCOM via an “enterprise registration system” and “enterprise credit information disclosure system,” and will be made publicly available. 

03


National Security Review introduced and codified in law



In addition to the “Negative List” setting forth what can and can not be invested in by foreign investors, the new Foreign Investment Law also introduced a national security review regime to review foreign investments in order to protect national security. However, the law omits the details of how this review regime will be established; comprehensive regulations may be issued in due course. What is clear is that China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) announced that it will take over responsibility from MOFCOM for the conduct of the review process.

04


More reassurance for foreign investor protection, including IP protection


The new Foreign Investment Law also addresses some of the discriminatory issues that have long been complained about by foreign investors. These issues have not always resulted from the law being discriminatory, but have been the result of a weak or selective enforcement of the law, or of some other practical reasons, including the following: 
i. foreign investors should be able to participate in the government procurement (in practice, Chinese government at various levels or localities might set some conditions so that domestic companies would have more chance to win the bid); 
ii. an assurance as to the ability of a foreign investor to remit income, including dividends paid by an FIE, or royalty payments under a cross-border licensing agreement, outside of China (inpractice, especially in recent years, foreign investors have occasionally complained that some offshore remittance was unduly delayed due to the “lack of quota” held by the remittance bank); 
iii. a restriction on expropriation. Among other things, foreign investors have long expressed concerns regarding the protection of their intellectual property in China. 
The new law reiterates a prohibition against the use of administrative measures to force transfers of technology, a recognition that the terms of any intellectual property licensing arrangement shall be a commercial matter for negotiation between the parties based on fairness, and the infringement of IPs shall be punished strictly according to law. Whether all these long-standing issues can effectively besolved will depend on corresponding amendments in other implementation laws or regulations, as well as whether the law-enforcement authorities and the judicial systems will duly perform their duties to adapt to the new regime.

Despite the above, there are still certain unresolved issues lingering in the new Foreign Investment Law that will either need to be further supplemented by implementation rules (such as point #4 above), or be further addressed. One of the questions that stands out the most is what the authorities are going to do about the so-called “VIE” structure (or “contractual arrangements” in lieu of equity control), commonly used by companies in restricted businesses aiming for offshore listing. In particular, the issue is whether an investment using a VIE structure shall be deemed as a foreign investment and therefore one that should be regulated by the Negative List, and how to deal with those companies using this structure that have already been listed in the offshore securities market, etc. Although an attempt has been made to address this issue in an earlier draft of this law (which caused tremendous attention from both the business and legal communities), the final Foreign Investment Law chose to be silent on this issue due to its complexity and the profound and far-reaching implications for the business world not only domestically but also globally. Before any concrete conclusion is made, the use of an VIE structure for IPO purpose will still be risky and challenging. 

This article simply functions as a very brief introduction to the new Foreign Investment Law which came into effect January 1, 2020. If you have any specific issues or questions, you can ask Daniel directly on www.Trustiics.com or drop him an email at li.zhuoru@jingtian.com.

The Author

Daniel Lee

Partner of Jingtian & Gongcheng, Shanghai Office 

Registered Counsel and Member of Quality Assurance Panel on Trustiics 

Mr. Daniel Lee obtained an LL.M. degree from Harvard Law School in 2001. He  has worked at Jingtian & Gongcheng Shanghai Office since 2012 as a partner. Prior to joining Jingtian & Gongcheng, Mr. Lee worked at Lee and Li, a leading firm in Taiwan, as well as at the U.S. elite firms Davis Polk & Wardwell, Morrison & Foerster and Weil, Gotshal & Manges for over a decade. 

Mr. Lee specializes in securities law and capital markets, cross-border M&A, foreign direct investments and general corporate counseling, etc.  Mr. Lee is a qualified lawyer in the following legal jurisdictions: mainland China, State of New York, the U.S., and Taiwan. 



—THEEND

Disclaimer 声明
For commercial reproduction, please contact Trustiics for authorization; for non-commercial reproduction, please indicate the source. Thank you. 

商业转载请联系Trustiics获得授权,未经书面许可任何机构和个人不得以任何形式修改、使用、复制或传播;非商业转载请注明出处。感谢配合。


Follow us:

             

Website  LinkedIn  Facebook   

【声明】内容源于网络
0
0
Trustiics 诚汇达
1234
内容 17
粉丝 0
Trustiics 诚汇达 1234
总阅读0
粉丝0
内容17