大数跨境

前额叶皮层治疗抑郁症10hz和iTBS刺激下比较

前额叶皮层治疗抑郁症10hz和iTBS刺激下比较 经颅磁刺激技术
2015-04-02
1
导读:发表于Brain Stimul. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2)结论:两种方式安全性和耐受性一样,两种方式治疗重度抑郁症疗效相当,且iTBS模式时间缩短。

rTMS of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for major depression: safety, tolerability, effectiveness, and outcome predictors for 10 Hz versus intermittent theta-burst stimulation.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Conventional rTMS protocols for major depression commonly employ stimulation sessions lasting >30 min. However, recent studies have sought to improve costs, capacities, and outcomes by employing briefer protocols such as theta burst stimulation (iTBS).

OBJECTIVE:

To compare safety, effectiveness, and outcome predictors for DMPFC- rTMS with 10 Hz (30 min) versus iTBS (6 min) protocols, in a large, naturalistic, retrospective case series.

METHODS:

A chart review identified 185 patients with a medication-resistant major depressive episode who underwent 20-30 sessions of DMPFC- rTMS (10 Hz, n = 98; iTBS, n = 87) at a single Canadian clinic from 2011 to 2014.

RESULTS:

Clinical characteristics of 10 Hz and iTBS patients did not differ prior to treatment, aside from significantly higher age in iTBS patients. A total 7912 runs of DMPFC- rTMS (10 Hz, 4274; iTBS, 3638) were administered, without any seizures or other serious adverse events, and no significant differences in rates of premature discontinuation between groups. Dichotomous outcomes did not differ significantly between groups (Response/remission rates: Beck Depression Inventory-II: 10 Hz, 40.6%/29.2%; iTBS, 43.0%/31.0%. 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: 10 Hz, 50.6%/38.5%; iTBS, 48.5%/27.9%). On continuous outcomes, there was no significant difference between groups in pre-treatment or post-treatment scores, or percent improvement on either measure. Mixed-effects modeling revealed no significant group-by-time interaction on either measure.

CONCLUSIONS:

Both 10 Hz and iTBS DMPFC- rTMS appear safe and tolerable at 120% resting motor threshold. The effectiveness of 6 min iTBS and 30 min 10 Hz protocols appears comparable. Randomized trials comparing 10 Hz to iTBS may be warranted.

刺激频率及模式:

10HZ 每次3000脉冲(左、右),脉冲每周5次,共4-6周

iTBS 每次600脉冲(左、右),6分钟,刺激2s,间歇8s(丛内50hz,丛内5hz)

因此,TBS模式在保障治疗效果的同时,缩短了治疗时间,提高了临床工作效率,值得推广应用。


【声明】内容源于网络
0
0
经颅磁刺激技术
1234
内容 156
粉丝 0
经颅磁刺激技术 1234
总阅读6
粉丝0
内容156